Southern Co-operative
Cascades Shopping Centre
John Lewis
Liquid
HIT Training
I Love Flyers
I'm Covered 365
Enterprise
Please log in for an exclusive offer to PBCRP members
Foresolutions
              www.beavertoolhire.co.uk               Tel: 023 9266 3599 Advertise your business here

The Portsmouth Business Crime Reduction Partnership helps businesses deal with theft, antisocial behaviour, burglary and violent crime.

Reduced staff morale from threats, intimidation, violence, and the perception by potential customers of an unsafe area, can adversely impact on the viability of local and city shopping centres, affecting both the daytime and night-time economy.

Join us now and make a difference!
Click here to see our Members Map

Recent News

11 August 2016 at 08:45
Our latest round-up of who has been in court.. http://trib.al/6IfEi7S
 
4 August 2016 at 22:27
STOP. One Punch Can Kill - Spread The Word, Tell The World Campaign The one punch epidemic and general issues of senseless violence is one which we unfortuna...
 
20 July 2016 at 20:49
n Sophie Sherrington, 27, of Victoria Road North, Southsea, admitted failing to provide a specimen of breath when suspected of drink-driving on June 17 in Portsmouth.
 
12 July 2016 at 18:59
BOYLE v Haverhill, Exclusion - Judicial Review


The reason that PBCRP is independent from the authorities is detailed below......... The application for judicial review was brought by Haverhill builder, Francis Boyle, following a decision taken by the participants of the Haverhill pubwatch scheme to extend by two years a ban imposed on him from all licensed premises taking part in the scheme.
His Honour Judge Mackie QC noted that the responsible operators of licensed premises in an area have always shared information and discussed matters of common interest, particularly questions of safety and compliance with the law, but in recent years these relationships have developed and become known as pubwatch schemes. He observed that an important function of these schemes is to share information about actual or potential troublemakers and make individual and collective decisions to refuse entry to those persons in their premises.
The case considered an issue of crucial importance not only the licensed trade, but also to local authorities and the Police who support and encourage the formation of local pubwatch schemes.
JD Wetherspoon joined the proceedings as an interested party to seek clarification of the circumstances, if any, that such schemes can be said to be exercising “functions of a public nature” and thereby making them amenable to judicial review. JD Wetherspoon recognised that the impact of a ruling that such schemes are susceptible to judicial review would have far-reaching implications for the licensed trade. In particular, it would mean that it would no longer be acceptable for a banning decision to be made simply on the basis of information provided by an individual licensee or the Police without first giving the person affected the opportunity to make representations and conducting the hearing and decision-making process on a much more formal footing.
Following argument by J D Wetherspoon’s counsel the Judge held that individual licensees have an unrestricted right to exclude anyone, particularly those who they see as troublemakers from their premises. Similarly, individual licensees have the right to exclude those whom others have found to be troublemakers. Furthermore, licensees are entitled to form groups or associations to pool information and discuss matters of common interest and make the exclusion of potential troublemakers more organised and systematic.

'HE CONCLUDED THAT THE ONLY BASIS FOR AN ARGUMENT THAT SUCH BANNING DECISIONS ARE AMENABLE TO JUDICIAL REVIEW LIES IN THE DEGREE OF INVOLVEMENT OF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY AND THE POLICE. IN CONSIDERING WHAT LEVEL OF POLICE INVOLVEMENT WOULD KEEP THE OPERATION WITHIN THE PRIVATE SPHERE, HIS HONOUR NOTED THAT HE WOULD NOT EXPECT THAT THE OPERATIONS OF A PARTICULAR PUBWATCH SCHEME WOULD BE OPEN TO JUDICIAL REVIEW IF THE ROLE OF THE POLICE AND OTHER PUBLIC BODIES WAS LIMITED TO THAT OF ADVICE AND SUPPORT'.

All pubwatches should be grateful for the actions of J D Wetherspoon in taking on this case as it will reduce the scope for further applications to challenge the decisions of Pubwatches.

The ‘Sting in the Tale’ for Mr Boyle is that the court will now consider costs and compensation against him. A costly challenge without merit may well be the outcome as far as he is concerned.
 
22 June 2016 at 18:26
Crimestoppers posts the Most Wanted by Region, County, Crime Type, and Most Wanted Campaigns.
 
21 June 2016 at 10:48
Here's our latest round-up of who has been in court http://trib.al/VpX12sh
 


More news from PBCRP...
Portsmouth City Pubwatch Hampshire Constabulary Disclaimer Home Office Safer Portsmouth Safer Business Award Kyle Bartlett Memorial Fund Street Pastors The Salvation Army